Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Logo
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Brief von Tibor Scitovsky an Josef Steindl

InC.Solo.dark

Access restriction

Free access

Copyright

This work is protected by copyright. You can find more informations here.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Brief von Tibor Scitovsky an Josef Steindl

Correspondence

Document type:
Correspondence
Collection:
Josef Steindl Collection
Title:
Brief von Tibor Scitovsky an Josef Steindl
Author:
Scitovsky, Tibor
Recipient:
Steindl, Josef
Scope:
Typoskript mit Unterschrift, 1 Blatt, 2 Seiten
Place of publication:
Stanford
Year of publication:
03/07/1981
Source material date:
7 March 1981
Language:
English
Note:
Mit handschriftlichen Anmerkungen von Josef Steindl.
Shelfmark:
S/B.86
Correspondence partner:
Steindl, Josef
Scitovsky, Tibor
Use and reproduction license:
In Copyright
Access:
Free access
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48671/nls.js.1504596074990

Full text

P.S. In an earlier paper of yours, on "Technical Progress and Evolution", 
which I found most interesting, I got confused right at the beginning and 
would be very grateful if you would straighten me out. 
You define N as cumulative output, c M as the Kca»Hisfei*B direct labor 
r N cost 
cost of the Nth unit, and as the cumulated direct labor A of N units. 
Accordidngly, eguation (6.2) is the integral of equation (6.1). So far so 
good. But on the next page you call N/C^ productivity, by which you 
presumably mean output per unit of labor. But isn't your definition of 
productivity a rather special one, very different from the usual definition, 
in that it is the average productivity averaged over the entire life-time 
irs 
of the plant or equipment. Is not the usual definition of productivity the 
differential of yours with respect to time?I get confused, because from your 
argument one gets the impression that those two productivities are one and 
the same thing. 
Is the answer to my puzzle that since you assume output to grow 
exponentially, those two very different productivity concepts grow at the 
same rate? 
Oti 
■■fj 
) 
Siril is ' 
i ■ tP C. - MC t- 
C&uJf ^ 
'IsU 
J. vUa./ ■ 
■ftA/ '* ^ f ft A* 
c
	        

Downloads

Downloads

Full record

ALTO TEI Full text PDF (compressed) PDF (full size) Mirador

This page

PDF Image Preview Image Small Image Medium Image Large Image Master ALTO TEI Full text Mirador

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Formats and links

Formats and links

The metadata is available in various formats. There are also links to external systems.

Formats

METS MARC XML Dublin Core

Links

DFG-Viewer Mirador

Cite

Cite

The following citation links are available for the entire work or the displayed page:

Full record

This page

Citation recommendation

Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.