Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
  • Rotate to the left
  • Rotate to the right
  • Reset image to default view
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The Personal Distribution of Income

Bibliographic data

Works

Document type:
Works
Collection:
Josef Steindl Collection
Title:
The Personal Distribution of Income
Author:
Steindl, Josef
Scope:
Typoskript, 28 Seiten
Year of publication:
1972
Source material date:
August-September 1972
Language:
English
Note:
Mit handschriftlichen Anmerkungen.
Related work:
Steindl, Josef: The Personal Distribution of Income. In: Steindl, Josef: Economic Papers 1941-88. London: Macmillan, 1990, S. 356-371
Topic:
Stochastic processes and size distribution
JEL Classification:
D31 [Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions]
Shelfmark:
S/M.2.1
Rights of use:
All rights reserved
Access:
Free access

Full text

12 
is 0,626 + 0,004 (data for 1962/63). The regression coefficient 
corresponds to our k. That k <! 1 can be explained in the first 
place by the presumed fact that with increasing wealth earned 
income is less and less important; in the second place perhaps 
by the fact that income from shares which dominates for the 
larger wealth does not contain the undistributed profits. 
Since the Pareto coefficient for wealth was 1,38 in 1962/63, 
we should expect it to be 2,20 for income on the basis of 
the theory. In reality it was 2,08. A better correspondence 
is hardly to be expected, since the independence condition holds 
only very approximately. 
A similar calculation with Swedish data /20/ gives apparently very 
bad results, although the regression of income on wealth is linear. 
To take an example: For married couples, both taxed, in 1971, the re 
gression coefficient of income on wealth is 0,49, the Pareto coeffi 
cient for/income ought thus to be 3,4, but it is in reality 2,5. 
The explanation is that the standard deviation of income increases 
with wealth (from 0,3 to 0,4 in the highest wealth class). This 
produced a thinning out of the tail of the income distribution, thus 
leading to a smaller Pareto coefficient than would otherwise obtain. 
The effect of increasing standard deviation is actually the same 
as that of a steepening of the regression line of income on wealth. 
/- C'V / /?s. ? W L'- 1 y-<J-
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Works

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS IIIF manifest Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Works

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Steindl, J. (1972). The Personal Distribution of Income.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Cookies