Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Logo Full screen
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
  • Rotate to the left
  • Rotate to the right
  • Reset image to default view
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Distribution Theory in Marx and in Kalecki.

Bibliographic data

Works

Document type:
Works
Collection:
Josef Steindl Collection
Title:
Distribution Theory in Marx and in Kalecki.
Author:
Steindl, Josef
Scope:
Typoskript, 3 Blätter, 4 beschriebene Seiten, mit zahlreichen eigenhändigen Korrekturen und Ergänzungen
Year of publication:
ohne Datum
Description:
Verteilungstheorie bei Kalecki und Unterschiede zur marxschen Verteilungstheorie, vor allem in Bezug auf Surplus (Mehrprodukt) und Monopol.
Note:
Unveröffentlichtes Typoskript.
Topic:
Economic history,economic theory,current developments
JEL Classification:
E11 [General Aggregative Models: Marxian, Sraffian, Kaleckian]
Shelfmark:
S/M.11.1
Rights of use:
All rights reserved
Access:
Free access

Full text

Distribution Theory in Marx and in Kalecki. 
OW- IQ70) 
Michal Kalecki very much shared the critical attitude of 
Marx in relation to the capitalist system. His reading of 
Marx in his student days strongly influenced his outlook. 
Moreover the starting point of his life-work in economics- 
'U&&Txh'C&*£' 
which paralleled and anticipated the work of Keynes - 
was the department scheme of Marx (Capital Vol II). 
Yet his views on distribution are widely different from 
those of Marx. In his view the surplus is formed on the 
markets of commodities and it is based on Hbiqax elements 
(trV. o,-opsC^ i } Cm TXtifa-u/S 
of monopoly, which are different in strength but basically 
ubiquitous in capitalism. 
By contrast Marx in his explanation of the surplus 
declines to take into account monopoly as a basic factor; 
his aim in the contrarary is to show that the surplus 
must arise (also) in an economy fully competitive on the 
markets for commodities. And, in the traditions of the 
classics to which he adhered in this respect, competiti/on 
implied free entry and free mobility of capital 
This after all was necessary to prove the equalisation of 
the profit rate which played such a large role in 
the theoretical arguments concerning the theory of value. 
Why should Marx have formulated his problem in this 
stringent way, making it harder to prove his case? 
I think the reasons are not far to seek: If he had rested 
his case to any extent on monopoly he would have risked 
erasing the dividing line between himself and a kind 
of radical liberal ideology which he did not share at all.
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Works

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS IIIF manifest Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Works

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Steindl, Josef. “Distribution Theory in Marx and in Kalecki.” N.p., ohne Datum. Print.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Cookies