Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
  • Rotate to the left
  • Rotate to the right
  • Reset image to default view
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Steedman versus Kalecki

Bibliographic data

Works

Document type:
Works
Collection:
Josef Steindl Collection
Title:
Steedman versus Kalecki: Fassung
Author:
Steindl, Josef
Scope:
Typoskript, 8 Blätter, mit zahlreichen eigenhändigen Korrekturen und Ergänzungen
Year of publication:
1993
Source material date:
[vermutlich um 1993]
Language:
English
Topic:
Growth,cycle and stagnation
JEL Classification:
E11 [General Aggregative Models: Marxian, Sraffian, Kaleckian]
Shelfmark:
S/M.13.1
Rights of use:
All rights reserved
Access:
Free access All rights reserved
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48671/nls.js.AC14446047

Full text

3 
in opposite directions ( why not? ) and wonders why Kalecki was so 
interested in the share of wages ( and who is not? ).Since he 
believed not without reason that this share was strongly 
influenced by the pricing of the products Kalecki had to conclude 
that it would act as a constraint on the real wage. What is there 
to puzzle about? 
I return now to the good advice concerning input-output 
techniques. It should certainly not be dismissed out of hand, but 
we have to be very careful about it because there are a number of 
... . . 
difficulties involved in this case. To start with, commodities are 
r*'. 
,S 
very ill defined. So are industries, which are almost all 
multiproduct and often there is joint production. The beautifully 
clean theory threatens to be mired up in a morassJ In fact, an 
input output matrix (also called technology matrix ) refers to 
technical processes; institutions - firms and industries - do not 
% 1> 
easily find a place there. 
tTM £*,, y 
O-Vv IA.J 
Moreover, the firms in one and the same industry do not have a 
uniform mark up, not according to Kalecki and not according to 
fact. From some points of view, including my own, these 
ri 
differences are very important. I think the complications which 
arise here are formidable, to say the very least. 
One more point. Sraffa's system of prices is always in the 
background in this discussion, even if he is not mentioned. Now 
what gives his system cohesion and makes it rich in results is the 
uniform rate of profit. We can have nothing like that in the case 
of Kalecki: The problem here is to show how the general surplus is 
unequally distributed in accordance with the different degree of 
market power which rules via the prices over the distribution. I 
^ JW ~ 
0 } 
, - , / 
do K. cC*Vt~- Vi"®**, Uf << *+ v
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Works

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS IIIF manifest Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Works

To quote this record the following variants are available:
DOI:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Steindl, J. (1993). Steedman versus Kalecki: Fassung. https://doi.org/10.48671/nls.js.AC14446047
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Cookies