Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Logo
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Policy Implications of Surplus Approach

InC.Solo.dark

Access restriction

Free access

Copyright

This work is protected by copyright. You can find more informations here.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Policy Implications of Surplus Approach

Works

Document type:
Works
Collection:
Josef Steindl Collection
Title:
Policy Implications of Surplus Approach
Author:
Steindl, Josef
Scope:
Typoskript, 4 Blatt, nummeriert, mit handschriftlichen Ergänzungen
Year of publication:
ohne Datum
Language:
English
Note:
Unveröffentlichtes Typoskript.
Topic:
Economic history,economic theory,current developments
JEL Classification:
E11 [General Aggregative Models: Marxian, Sraffian, Kaleckian]
Shelfmark:
S/M.59.3
Use and reproduction license:
In Copyright
Access:
Free access
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48671/nls.js.AC14446130

Full text

Policy Implications of the Surplus Approach 
1.In contrast to neo-elassics the surplus approach leaves 
the field wide open for considerations of socio-political 
and institutional factors. 
2. Once we descend to the level of economic policy we 
have to recognise that the two classes model ( labour - capital ) 
does not exhaust the variety of empirical phenomena. 
A. There are sectors which from the theoretical point of 
view must be called not aapitalist , for example, the 
peasantry; also the independent small artisans, and the 
professional classes. ( Julio Lopez ) 
The peasant and artisan income is sui generis. You cannot 
split it upwithout doing violence to the conepts of wage or profit 
B. How much does the surplus contain? Is it gross or net of 
taxes? According to an exa.mple of Marx ( Eapital I. p.228 ) 
it is gross. Sweezy-Baran even include wasteful expenditure. 
A stricter concept would be property income (profit, interest 
and rent, the classical concept ). 
But what about the managers income? It is again a kind of 
hybrid concept. There is much to be said for including it 
in the surplus? 
Analogies: In the feudal economy the surplus extracted from 
the peasants was used to pay also the retainers and domestic 
servants. In this sense we could consider managers salaries 
and perhaps a good deal else part of the surplus? 
C. From the point of view of economic policy the personal 
distribution of income is to-day at least as much relevant 
as the surplus.
	        

Downloads

Downloads

Full record

ALTO TEI Full text PDF (compressed) PDF (full size) Mirador

This page

PDF Image Preview Image Small Image Medium Image Large Image Master ALTO TEI Full text Mirador

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Formats and links

Formats and links

The metadata is available in various formats. There are also links to external systems.

Formats

METS MARC XML Dublin Core

Links

OPAC DFG-Viewer Mirador

Cite

Cite

The following citation links are available for the entire work or the displayed page:

Full record

This page

Citation recommendation

Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.