Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Logo Full screen
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
  • Rotate to the left
  • Rotate to the right
  • Reset image to default view
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Comment on Prof. Pivetti's paper

Bibliographic data

Works

Document type:
Works
Collection:
Josef Steindl Collection
Title:
Comment on Prof. Pivetti's paper
Author:
Steindl, Josef
Scope:
Typoskript, 5 Blätter
Year of publication:
1986
Language:
English
Note:
Unveröffentlichtes Typoskript, Mimeo. - Handschriftliche Anmerkung auf Seite 1: "revised June 1986".
JEL Classification:
E12 [General Aggregative Models: Keynes, Keynesian, Post-Keynesian] E11 [General Aggregative Models: Marxian, Sraffian, Kaleckian]
Shelfmark:
S/M.65.2
Rights of use:
All rights reserved
Access:
Free access

Full text

/to*** h'-'W 
Comment on Prof.Pivetti 1 s paper by J.Steindl 
Professor Pivetti's paper is admirably suited to bring 
into focus the differences which exist among us 
between various lines of thinking ( tentatively identified 
as Neo-Ricardian as against Post-Keynesian or Kaleckian). 
To go to the heart of the matter, these differences concern 
the role which we attribute to the actual importance of 
monopoly elements in our 20th century society. A further 
difference is the question whether we can use equilibrium 
relations to draw conclusions about the response of 
the economic system to changes imposed on it. 
In certain other respects ideas from the various strands 
of thought seem to overlap. That profit rate, and not as 
Marx and the classics wanted, the real wage, is subject 
to prior determination and the share of the other side - wage 
is left as a residual - the inversion of Marx as it were - 
is shared also by post-keynesian writers . It is only 
when we ask what determines the profit rate that the 
opinions divide. But again, that the determination should 
come from the interest is an opinion found in Keynes, 
only, again, the mechanism of the influence is different: 
With Keynes the influence would come about in so far 
as a discrepancy between profit and interest would act 
on investment. How does this influence of interest on profit 
work according to Prof.Pivetti? 
He refers to the equilibrium system of prices of production 
based on normal cost and a uniform rate of profit,equal to 
interest •
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Works

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS IIIF manifest Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Works

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Steindl, J. (1986). Comment on Prof. Pivetti’s paper.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Cookies