Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
  • Rotate to the left
  • Rotate to the right
  • Reset image to default view
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Comment on Prof. Pivetti's paper

Bibliographic data

Works

Document type:
Works
Collection:
Josef Steindl Collection
Title:
Comment on Prof. Pivetti's paper
Author:
Steindl, Josef
Scope:
Typoskript, 5 Blätter
Year of publication:
1986
Language:
English
Note:
Unveröffentlichtes Typoskript, Mimeo. - Handschriftliche Anmerkung auf Seite 1: "revised June 1986".
JEL Classification:
E12 [General Aggregative Models: Keynes, Keynesian, Post-Keynesian] E11 [General Aggregative Models: Marxian, Sraffian, Kaleckian]
Shelfmark:
S/M.65.2
Rights of use:
All rights reserved
Access:
Free access

Full text

/ 
2 
r©l£i"bioris 
But can these equilibrium wtee be used to draw conclusions 
about a process of adjustment? In actual fact there is 
a jumble of capital assets from different periods with 
different techniques and different cost of output. 
If there is anything that empirical study can show it is 
the fact of vast differences in cost of production between 
different firms ( not temporary or accidental but systematic!). 
How can a calculation of normal cost uund uniform rate of 
profit be applied under such circumstances? In fact, 
there are all the time new techniques emerging, upsetting 
all chance of equilibrium being ever reached, and the various 
producers will be modest or ambitious in their profit 
requirements according to their circumstances. Surely 
Schumpeter was just a little nearer to the truth when 
he related profits to these dynamic considerations? 
Prof.Pivetti has carefully analysed the dilemma 
ft 
whichpight arise if we assumed an automatic adjustment 
of profit rate to interest: This would preclude any effect 
of interest changes on investment. His solution: Short run 
changes in interest will affect investment, but once they 
are regarded as permanent the price adjustment occurs and 
there can be no further effect on quantities. 
The necessary condition for this "price effect" is competition: 
No impediments to free entry and mobility. Prof Pivetti 
is perfectly aware of the importance of this assumption 
(p.27) and he tries very hard to play6 down these 
disturbing elements.
	        

Cite and reuse

Cite and reuse

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Works

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS IIIF manifest Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF DFG-Viewer OPAC

Image

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Works

To quote this record the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Image

Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Steindl, J. (1986). Comment on Prof. Pivetti’s paper.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Cookies