Ownership as interpersonal dominance

Rudmin, Floyd W.

Bibliographic data

Book

Document type:: Book

Collection:: POP - Possession, Ownership, Property

Title:: Ownership as interpersonal dominance: a history and three studies of the social psychology of property

Author:: Rudmin, Floyd W.

Year of publication:: 1988

Language:: English

Subject:: Besitz Eigentum Sozialpsychologie

Topic:: C - Psychology

Shelfmark:: C/R916 O9

Rights of use:: Free access

Access:: Free access

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.48671/pop.AC14489044

3 the minimum, non-owners are expected to inhibit their actions with respect to the owner's property. Conceptual and methodological issues in this research will be addressed after an historical survey of psychological explanations of property. These will be followed by three methodologically distinct empirical studies demonstrating that interpersonal dominance plays a role in the psychology of owning property. HISTORY To date, there has been little historical research on the psychology of property and ownership. The following historical survey, though largely original, does make use of Schlatter’s (1951) and Strauss and Cropsey’s (1963) histories of political economy, Copleston’s (1953; 1958; 1963) history of philosophy, and Drever’s (1917) history of instinct theory. This survey will show that five basic psychological explanations of property can be traced in the history of Western psychology. These are often supportive of one another and represent different explanatory interests rather than competing theories. It is not yet clear why these particular theories persist through history. 1) Private property is self-centered. It defines, extends, and reinforces the person’s sense of self. 2) There are innate biological tendencies for owning. These may be instincts of self-preservation or species tendencies for hierarchical social organization. 3) Private property is a prerequisite for moral development. Logically and developmentally, private possession must precede the moral decision to share or to give. 4) Owning is based on knowing. An object or resource becomes part of and under the control of the person who fully understands it, knows how to use it, and is most familiar with it. 5) Property is a form of symbolic expression. A person’s material possessions communicate personal and social information, dependent on cultural norms of interpretation. Though an interpersonal dominance account of property probably cannot stand as a sixth tradition, it can be shown to have had a significant place in each of the other explanations of property. Finally, it is important to note that the historical development of scholarship on property is coincident with, and in large part responsibie for, the historical development of cross-cultural scholarship. It was early recognized that psychology and culture are confounded

Book

Cite and reuse

Book

Image

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation