Ownership as interpersonal dominance

Rudmin, Floyd W.

Bibliografische Daten

Buch

Dokumentenart:: Buch

Sammlung:: POP – Possession, Ownership, Property

Titel:: Ownership as interpersonal dominance: a history and three studies of the social psychology of property

Autor/in:: Rudmin, Floyd W.

Erscheinungsjahr:: 1988

Sprache:: Englisch

Schlagwort:: Besitz Eigentum Sozialpsychologie

Thema:: C - Psychologie

Signatur:: C/R916 O9

Nutzungsrechte:: Freier Zugriff

Zugriff:: Freier Zugriff

DOI:: https://doi.org/10.48671/pop.AC14489044

iNTRODUCTION Our lives are regulated to a remarkable extent by property. Where we go and what objects we use -almost everything we do- must be sensitive to individual property rights and social property norms. Disputes between individuals and between groups often revolve around conflicting property claims. The rules of ownership are codified in law, and major social institutions are in place to enforce and adjudicate those laws and to punish property violators. Our various religions address property as a moral issue and often endorse propertylessness as a prerequisite for certain levels of religious attainment. Internationally, many of the current political and military confrontations are disputes over ownership of territory, and the larger East-West confrontation is based in part on disagreements over social and political conceptualizations of property. Popular and academic discussions of property in these different contexts often make use of psychological levels of explanation, but typically without reference to psychological research. There is clearly a place for a more extensively developed and more widely available literature on the psychology of property and ownership. Certainly it would seem that thoughts, habits, emotions, and rules pertaining to the ownership of objects and other resources have a greater and more constant influence on human behavior than many of the more arcane topics that proliferate in psychology. As Drever (1917) noted when commenting on the relative lack of attention given to property, ...few [topics] present difficulties of which the psychological solution is more interesting, and few play so prominent a part in the ordinary, everyday life of Man....the impulse to appropriate and possess is powerful in the adult, as in the child, in the civilized man, as In the savage. (Drever, 1917, pp. 187-188) Thorndike (1940) similarly made a call for an historically and culturally sensitive psychology of political economy. Although topics related to property have a recognized literature and are indexed in Psychological Abstracts (e.g. “altruism”, “hoarding”, “jealousy”, “materialism”, “personal space”, “poverty”, “privacy”, “selfishness”, “territoriality”, “theft”), the psychological literature on property per se is dispersed, and “property” has not been indexed in Psychological Abstracts since 1953. Perhaps psychologists have come to believe that the topic belongs to the more political of the social sciences. However, the social science literature on property is multidisciplinary, and psychology Is in fact represented (Rudmin, 1986a; Rudmin, Belk & Furby, 1987).

Buch

Download und Zitieren

Buch

Bild

Bildfragment

Zitierlinks

Zitierempfehlung