From Stagnation in the 30s to Slow Growth in the 70s.

Steindl, Josef

Bibliographic data

Works

Document type:: Works

Collection:: Josef Steindl Collection

Title:: From Stagnation in the 30s to Slow Growth in the 70s.: Fassung 1

Author:: Steindl, Josef

Scope:: Typoskript, 21 Blätter, mit zahlreichen Anstreichungen

Year of publication:: 1989

Source material date:: [vermutlich um 1989]

Subject:: Wirtschaftsentwicklung Technischer Fortschritt Vollbeschäftigung Stagnation Effective Nachfrage Industrie Kapazitätsauslastung Wettbewerb

Note:: Kopie einer Fassung mit kopierten ursprünglich handschriftlichen Korrekturen und handschriftlichen Anmerkungen und Anstreichungen (nicht vom Verfasser). Der vorliegende Text wurde in einer minimal geänderten Fassung zweimal publiziert. - In den "Economic Papers" fehlt der einleitende Absatz ("Personal Reminiscenes").

Related work:: Steindl, Josef: From Stagnation in the 30s to Slow Growth in the 70s. In: Steindl, Josef: Economic Papers 1941-88. London: Macmillan, 1990, S. 166-180 Steindl, Josef: From Stagnation in the 30s to Slow Growth in the 70s. In: Berg, Maxine (Hrsg.): Political Economy in the Twentieth Century. New York [u.a.]: Allan, 1990, S. 97-115

Topic:: Growth,cycle and stagnation

JEL Classification:: E32 [Business Fluctuations, Cycles] O11 [Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development]

Shelfmark:: S/M.77.28

Access:: Free access

2 These were also the years of a strong socialist conviction which in the subsequent course of time has been sorely tried. I have hardly been influenced very much by Marx as far as the "pure Economics" i.e. the labour value theory and all that is linked to it, is concerned. I preferred to think of profits as the consequence of the lack of free entry which is ubiquitous and essential in capitalism,^ insofar as you need wealth in order to set up in business, and there is a hierarchy of wealth, which reserves the opportunities of exploiting the advantage of large scale to the large wealth, which is scarce. Thus profit is a differential rent like Ricardos positional rent. ti wmnwr-m^ I think this is rather easier to understand than the tortuous arguments about the increase in working time and intensity, and it meetsthe traditional economist on his own ground. These ideas are connected with my interest in the theory of the firm and with the role of oligopoly and concentration. I have once been told that I have been referred to in Russian literature as a "petty bourgeois economist". May be the description is not so wrong and it is getting less wrong as time goes on . I remember that KaLEcki once got furious with me because in a paper on profits I said that the small entrepreneur, being at the margin, earned no profits. He insisted on my taking this out of the paper, because he did not want to exonerate any part of the capitalists. For the political position of Kalecki it is however remarkable that he, although quite

Works

Cite and reuse

Works

Image

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation