Full text: Brief von Josef Steindl an Jerzy Osiatyński

A-1050 Wien Schwarzhorng 10/17 
Jfily 19, 1079- 
Dear Osiatynski, 
T hank you for your letter. I am very glad that you 
find it possible to include my paper on the three versions of 
the trade cycle into the Kalecki volume 2, and I certainly never 
expected anything but the acknowledgements which you propose to make. 
Let re repeat that I was very happy to receive the volume 1 
and that T realise y'U have done a very considerable and successful 
piece of w irk 
f* 
Concerning y>ur p int abut my ambridge paper: If the 
oligip lists sell all their products to the government and the 
government sipply finances the increased price by a budget efiqit 
then y u are certainly right: the utilisation will be unchanged 
and the v lume if profits will be increased ( I think it is by a mere 
slip that ypu state it will be the same) because the increased 
saving due t> the olig p'lists will be compensated by government 
dissaving My only c 'mment is that in practice the oligoplistic sector 
will always sell a great part of its produfet to private customers 
and an incre se in profit margins will therefore reduce the real 
income of the rest of the economy, leading therfo e to a decrease 
in utilisation. Your argument is, then, a qualification to my 
statement, and it is certainly interesting in view of the 
close customer relation of oligopolists and g vernment. 
As to your other argument in relation to section 5 of my 
Trade C ir cle paper, I never denied that Kalecki perfectly well knew 
all this ( the influence of debts or of commitments on ■'■nvestment ), 
but it is n^t included in his strict mathematical ( or formal ) 
formulation of the trade cycle theory - which, incidentally, I did not 
want to criticise at all, because I realise that a trade cycle theory 
ought ti embody only the most important and general elements of 
an explanation. 
It strikes me h wever, that this section 5 of my paper 
leaves something in the dark which may have contributed to your 
misund rstanding The c ntrast between a"marginal" and an "integral" 
formulation in principle applies to b th the financial incentives 
to invest (internal saving - ir degree of indebtedness) and to 
the demand incentives ( increase in demand - or capacity utilisation ).
	        

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.