„Gryf” Hibnera 3, zam. 739/75, n. 2000
AKADEMIA NAUK
OTistorii Nauki
Warszawa, dnia 6....1;3.F.C.h,
197.3... r.
Oswiaty i Techniki
ol. Nowy Swiat 72, pok. 19. tel. 26-83-05
00-330 WARSZAWA
Dr. J. Osiatyiiski
* *
* % o
Professor Joseph Steindl
Osterreichisches Institut
ftir Wirtschaftsforschung
A-1103 Wien
Postfach 9T
Dear Professor Steindl,
Thank you for your letters of 20th January and 1st February. I did
not answer them any earlier because I have been waiting for a letter
from Dr. Gomulka with some extra details.
I am very happy to be able .to use your note on Dr. Gomulka’s work
and am most obliged for the effort you have taken to prepare it. Your
note will be incorporated into the editirial comment which goes with
the Kalecki’s Trend and Business Cycle, 1968, EJ, paper. I have allo
wed myself to introduce some minor changes /merely of stylistic charao
. ter/ in its Polish translation. Also, in order to fit your note into
the text wich proceeds it I have supplied it with an opening paragraph
which reads as follows:
This problem 55 was taken up by St. Gomulka, London School of Econo
mics, in his unpublished paper: Trend and Business Cycle: A Note on
Kalecki’s Theory of Growth under Pure Capitalism. This paper gave
start to a discussion in w r hich J. Steindl made great contribution into
the interpretation of St. Gomulka»s results concerning the conditions
for stability of the solution to Kalecki’s business cycle cum trend
equation. Because some formal results about the eqation and the condi
tions for stability are of more general interest, a short comment on
this subject follows below."
* In the paragraph immediately above I mention the discussions on
stability problem of the solution to Kalecki’s business cycle cum trend
00110+1 rm in his 1Q68 EJ naner /these discussions took place in the
this problem" refers to.
P.T.O.