The London School of Economics and Political Science
( University of London )
Houghton Street,
London WG2A 2AE
Telephone: 01-405 7686
lelegrams: Poleconics, London
Telex: 24655 BLPES G
Department of Economics
Professor Josef Steindl
Schwarzhorng 10/17
A-1050 Wien
Austria
13th March 1987
Dear Professor Steindl,
[ appreciated very much your recent comments on my joint paper on Kalecki's
theory of growth under capitalism. Your welcome complements apart, you
appear to be puzzled by my treatment of "rash capitalism. Let me explain
that, similarly as Kalecki, I also attempt to establish the existence
of a balanced growth path. In the case when h < h, there exists such
a path and the analysis is very much the same as that of Kalecki in his
E.J. (1962) paper. However, there is nothing in Kalecki's theory to rule
out the case in which h > h. In this case the trend cannot be established
in the usual way as a stable balanced growth (BG) solution. The Kaleckian
theory of the cycle is still there. The problem is that cyclical fluctuations
are, in this case, explosive. But we know that the movements in investment
and output must be contained by the ceiling and the floor. Kalecki himself
recognised this possibility in his Theory of Economic Dynamics. He pointed
this out to me, when we discussed his E.J.(1962) paper and an earlier
version of his E.J. (1968) paper, back in 1966-7. This was in response
to my analysis thathis implicit assumption that the lower BG rate is always
stable may, in fact, be wrong. He took the point seriously and did recognise
without any ado that,in this case ythe trend cannot be established without
the reference to the floor and the ceiling. Later, I felt, that it was
in part that series of discussions which led him, in his E.J. (1968) paper,
effectively to abandon the attempt to endogenise the trend and, instead,
to explain it in terms of long term changes which in his model are exogenously
given.
The trend under rash capitalism is established endogenously to the extent
to which the floor and the ceiling levels of investment depend on the
capital stock, which itself is determined by the trend level of investment
in the past.
[ look forward to receiving your further comments. With my best wishes,
yours sincerely,
AD WIN Go oo Sa
Stanislaw Gomulka
"he London School of Economics and Political Science is incorporated as a company limited by guarantee
inder the Companies Acts ( Reg. No. 70527 ) Registered Office, Houghton Street. London WC2A 2AF