Full text: Brief von Josef Steindl an Stanisław Gomułka

£2 wu ask re why 1 did not sce thio before the anotwcr -O 
nuh prolably neony readers as you and ~yoelf have been inclined 
so oco in the use of finicet differences bh: bkplecki a natter of form, 
but it woo in fact o natter of substance. I think: this removes 
sha baois of our criticien of his trend ergunmento. I noy neation 
that oh one tie I srrvedl the idea that o trend sho 1d be rencrated 
it cnt teehnole tied i movaticns, but I hove come to the conclusi. no 
shat I wos urens. There ic no Joubt, however, ho totic dis tie 
cot difficult part of Haleckin arguments , and the cxolena ion of 
thio trond leaves uel to be lane. 
ars sincerely,

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.