13 
Table 
Sweden 1971 
married 
couples 
single 
persons 
Holland 1962 
Wealth distribution 
Pareto coefficient 
(whole range, 
11 values) 1.78 1,73 1*53 
Regression of 
income on wealth 
coefficient yL : 0.56 0,65 0.63 
Calculated Pareto 
coefficient for 
income: 3,19 2.66 
2.20 
Actual Pareto 
coefficiet for 
income ( 5 values) 2.62 2.14 2.08 
ditto, excluding 
the open size 
class of wealth 3*12 2.62 
The above table gives the vilues for the coefficient 
of regression of the mean income on wealth. The correlation is very 
high ( r is ,997 ) for the mean income values; for the mean square 
correlation of the grouped income data it is modest, r2= .25 in 
Holland. 
From the actual ^areto coefficient for wealth and the 
coefficient we can calculate the Pareto coefficiet for income 
in accordance with equation (S>). In Holland we obtain 2.20, 
which compares with an actual P a reto coefficient cfor income of 
wealth owners of 2.08. ( The coefficient for all incomes including 
pepple with no tamable wealth, is not markedly different, which 
is rather surprising). 
Butch 
While the/results are not worse than could be expected^ 
the Swedish data are less straightforward. A peculiarity is here 
that married couples ( to some extent also children ) are jointly 
assessed for wealth tax so that their joint wealth and income is given 
in the data. This leads to a splitting up of the mass of wealth