13 
Table 
Sweden 1911 
married 
couples 
single 
oersons 
Holland 1Q62/3 
health distribution 
Pareto coefficient 
(whole range, 
11 values) 1.78 
Regression of 
income on wealth 
coefficient yC : 0.56 
Calculated Pareto 
coefficient for 
income: 5»18 
Actual Pareto 
coefficiet for 
income ( 5 values) 2.62 
1.73 
0.65 
'2.66 
2.14 
ditto, excluding 
the open size 
class of wealth 5*12 2.62 
1.53 
0.63 
2.20 
2.08 
The above table gives the vilues for the coefficient 
of regression of the mean income on wealth. The correlation is very 
high ( r is ,997 ) for the mean income values; for the mean square 
correlation of the grouped income data it is modest, r?~ .25 in 
Holland. 
From the actual ^areto coefficient for wealth and the 
coefficient we can calculate the Pareto coefficiet for income 
in accordance with equation (6>). In Holland we obtain 2.20, 
which compares with an actual Pareto woefficient (for income of 
wealth owners of 2.08. ( The coefficient for all incomes including 
pepple with no taxable wealth, is not markedly different, which 
is rather surnrising). 
Butch 
TThile the/results are not-worse than could be expected f 
the Swedish data are less straightforward. A peculiarity is here , 
that married couoles { to some extent also children ) are jointly 
assessed for wealth tax so that their joint wealth and income is given 
in,the data. This leads to a splitting up of the mass of wealth