This surplus rate has been defined for me
admirably by Sraffa ???
We have only to supplement his picture by
including the labourthe subsistence of labour
as a commodity to be reproduced,
and in so far as the amount of subsistence is institutionally-
historically determined, the whole concept of
the surplus rate ???is ? to some extent
arbitrary. [This explains that in Kaleckis view of
distribution??? there seems
to be no such limit to the shift in the
share of distribution].
Now if we under light of this objective ? and see