5
structure etc.). There is, however, another explanation:
Ol/
The comparison of firms in.cross section and the develop-
&V€-t is h
ment time not the some thing. Over time, the real
wage increases^and with it the value of output in terms
of labour input decreases. This will counteract the
cheapening of capital equipment du to scale effects; In
other words, the differential profit margin of the large
jhihnv
ipale will he reduced as the large scale methods spread,
and the value of output will fall relatively to a given
capital equipment with given labour cost.'The impression
is that a race between the cheapening of equipment and the
cheapening of output is continuously on and neither is
getting too far ahead of the other.
/k
of
So much for the interpetation’~ data. What about the
theoretical discussion of Chapter III? Ky analysis there
shows under what conditions an increase in capital co
efficient will be profitable and this analysis may be
applied also outside the context of the problem of
economies of scale. The conditions are these: The pro
portionate reduction in cost divided by the proportional&
increase in capital-coefficient must not be smaller than
the profit margin from which we start (that is ( the profit
margin obtained with alternative or usual methods) } other
wise the profit rate will be lower than at the outset
(that is } with alternative or usual methods).
S)
Capital is always measured at cost-value, inflated with
a convenient price index to give a measure of reproduction
cost.