17
at 100.000), in view of tho higher Dweklisch income level,
conceals the relevant port of the Pareto distribution
which pres usably would show a nuch higher Pareto co
efficient than the income below 100.000 crowns does.
For 1958/59 (see / /) data ore available on the various
types of income ofproperty owners in Hollands 1) income
of unincorporated business and professions 2) unearned
income, and 3) other income (which is chiefly income
trou employment). She simple regressions of those three
incomes on the total income of property owners hove boon
calculated (fir;. 4). The regression coefficients are
respectively b„, * 0.30, bp - .1.34 ami u- » 1,01.
This shows that with increasing wealth the share of
income derived from property is increasing*
2ho Pareto coefficient for wealth in 1033/30 is 1.37*
for income of property owners it is 2.03. If we outlast©
it on the basis of the theory’, the coefficient for In
come would be 1.94 (since k in that year is about 0,31).
Cn the basic of the above information m can derive
theoretical estimates of Pareto coefficients for the above
mentioned three income types separately from the Pareto
coefficient for total income of property owners, which in
turn can be derived from the coefficient for the wealth
distribution, Va can write for the density of, for