„"V’ : .A
f
v
* /
x^ v/
VV-lA^ > :Vtn*rtO <W hsZA^d~- ^UvpitVM.^ IfUiii c^ . ■(.
VvW ^ ^Vst «H< ^ 5V*'” ^‘Wv^ti' *v csUr*. ,U^ t
^ OWiob'iA/'oi [UP'L U-j -S' TVfe-^uc **£«-.$.*
he complexity of the whole issue comes fron
om the f§/5t tm
both th-e initiative and experience of the firms - so highly
praised by the believers in laissez faire - and the ^Vj
coordination function of the government are needed
and the interpray^jbetween the two requires great organisational
effort. To~~coordinate Tlie government must Kin
deal of knowledge of the most varied kind - technological •/
as well as socio-economic knowledge - and for this it C
needs ajstaff of experts of very specific training.
The trouble is that such training is very rare because
our traditional organisation of subjects is such that
the relevant knowledge belongs to the no-man’s land between
the subjects. We have never thought of training systematically
this type of peaple. Nor have we ever thought of systematically
organising the study of questions which are relevant for
the task of restructuring industry. It involves a new way
of thinking and new attitudes which are completely alien
to our politicians, public servants. They are not farsighted
enough to think in such terms.
It goes without saying that this is a very long term job.'
— — >xy *i W- u.v.^ ^ tv-
In pratice the development of new products and methods will
not be possible without new entrepreneurs. They are able to
bring a new dynamism into the development ( examples are
silicon valley, the regional developments in the Toscana
Modena and Emilia ). They are difficult to produce
synthetically and governments have not been successful in
trying that. Of course, all existing vested interest conspire
against it.
U
T'W V-v-jKk
X
\u^ 'i+.yi
1 {
i