ho 
Discussion 
The interpretation of these results will be discussed 
in seven sub-sections. First, consideration will be given 
to the qualifications that should be put on the results. As 
well, the interpretation of the recall listings of the 
negatively defined category, i.e.things not owned, will be 
considered. Then the recall exemplars. themselves will be 
discussed. The central analyses of the ‘study were the rank 
orderings and the clusterings of the criteria according to 
the four judgement schemes. These will be discussed as 
separate topics, and then conclusions and comparisons with 
the “findings of other research will be presented. Finally, 
the thesis will close with a discussion relating the results 
to the set theory framework of ownership presented in the 
introduction, along with general directions for future 
studies. 
Nualifications 
The results of this study need to be considered with a 
number of qualifications in mind. First of all, although 
the study did sample other than a student population as is 
common with many studies in psychology, the subjects did 
eae from restricted institutional settings. Most notably, 
university non-academic staff and insurance company staff 
represent people involved in institutions and work that do