2m
Roos (1968) studied the personal control and power that territoriality gives crew members on a
warship, and observed that crew members in their own personalized work-station territories
would display behavioral dominance over intruding officers who in fact had superior rank.
Esser, Chamberlain, Chapple and Kline (1965) reported that mental patients who were more
dominant used larger and more central territories of the ward than those who were less
dominant. Esser (1968) replicated this with a group of hospitalized children. In 1970, Esser
defined the territory of mental patients by occupancy duration and reported that those few
patients who had territory won 85% of attempts at physical dominance within their territory and
55% of those outside their territory. Paluck and Esser (1971) studied the use of aggression by
retarded boys in playroom settings and concluded that territoriality reduces social and
cognitive complexity and enhances personal control. In a final study by Esser (1973) of
institutionalized boys, territory holders were found to have higher dominance ranking than those
without territories.
Sundstrom and Altman (1974) examined the relationship of territoriality and dominance in
a study of male delinquents in a residential institution. They found dominance and the
possession of territory to have positive correlations in the first three observation periods, but
to be nonsignificant in the fourth, even though dominance ranks were stable across all four
periods. Although Sundstrum and Altman (1974) and Edney (1974) leave this unexplained, it may
be, as in Levine's (1983) study of preschoolers, that possessiveness establishes self-identity
and relative social rank among strangers and can be omitted once relationships stabilize. In an
earlier study by Altman and Haythorn (1967), sailors wars experimentally paired for differences
in personality traits, including dominance, and observed for 10 days of isolation together in a
single room. Incompatibility on dominance and affiliation traits resulted in a high rate of
territorial behavior compared to matched controls who were not isolated. Finally, in a study not
in Edney’s (1974) review, Austin and Bates (1974) found that dominant prison inmates confined
to a prison bullpen camp had more possessions and more territorial control than less dominant
inmates.
Other studies have shown territoriality and dominance to be related. Delong (1970)
studied seating arrangements and leadership qualities of students in a 16-week seminar and
found two sub-groups. Those seating themselves to the student leader's right saw the student
jeader as the dominant authority, while those seating themselves to the teacher's right saw him