## Full text: Konvolut The Personal Distribution of Income 1

```Footnotes to-p.4 •
I
1) Although: Champernowne r s, theory is mors complicated than the
simple- model which takes its placs in the above reasoning,
we. can easily extend the conclusions:. With Shampernowne, the-
.." promotion is stochastic, with probabilities'of .non-promotion
and demotion» In. this more general-case p in, the above solution
■ T has to be replaced by b which is the root of ht he - characteristic.
_ f ~~ r -L . > .. rjftf ■
equation of the matrix aT
't'W W- X'hL h £> tc&i ,
/
-/ .
'"' •'The Pareto coefficient -in the simple case is - ^ °
the ratio
‘ of the- parameters of the'two-exponential distributionsin the
. . .... N
more- general case of' Champernowne the Pareto; coefficient is*
In. b
» h could be regarded as .-the-parameter of'an age dis-
. -T
as age classesj
tribution,. if the classes (states of the system) are regarded
, SlBsf&lr ■fc r 3f~ f Ci, VL ic fcW ti~t.
* £r &&<*•■. <«2*-
2-X Champernowne .apparently did nor know Yule r s„ paper: It was
■ Hi.Simonis merit to have.brough“ it. to 'the- attention -of
i economists ;. unfortunately he reproduced! it: in a form which
obscured its essence* which is ehe interplay of the two ex
ponential distributions >. i.e. of two stochastic processes-
/ a
ylA.
- ßJ) Lsts&ij' 1 Ij?* ,X-
.... ’ L .. ' '
} ^k ■ ,/y
c >uya~
t
(J? \p\, ^ tt*- l -
sy* £*TV^
```

### Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.