Full text: Konvolut Wealth and Income Distribution 2

We can then represent the density of income g (y) by means of 
randomisation as follows: 
g (y) = 
f t*) * 
where is 
(w-y)e 
0 
the 
dw = 
> 
transform of 
(w) 
The above mixture is a Laplace transform of (w), shifted to the 
right by y. 
The Laplace transform requires that (w) is defined as equal to 
zero for w o . If the density function is shifted to the 
right, the densties for w v will therefore be zero. We have 
thus to assume that w y (in other words, that there are no cases 
of wealth smaller than income, which means the rate of return must 
be less than 100%). 
Equation (2) shows that the Pareto form of the wealth distribution 
is reproduced in the income distribution, provided the independence 
condition is fulfilled, and y w. 
We have now to face the fact that the rate of return on wealth 
will in reality not be independent of wealth. The cross-classifi 
cations of wealth and income ^wealth ownersffor Holland, Sweden) 
show that income is a linear function of wealth, the regression 
coefficient being smaller than unity. We can easilv take account 
of that by defining a conditional rate of return density or rather 
its mirror function as (kw-v), where k is the regression coefficient 
of y on w. Assuming that the variance and the higher moments of
	        

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.