Full text: Income Distribution: Line of Reasoning (Fassung 2)

Simon n executives 
First asoumpt ons A constant span of control at all levels o r 
the hierarchy. n fHis ought oally to be a random v riablo. 
This leads to: S else ( number of executives according to 
Simon, but a reasonable mo .'..sure would b& 
capital or sales) L level of the hierarchy 
lrx S = L In n + con tant 
Second assue tion: A constant rati ; bet .eon a eon's . :alary and that 
of his subordinate, b (also that ought lobe a random variable ) 
C 
That is used to determine the alary f the top executive in 
terns >f these at other levels: 
In C *■* L In b + constant 
By elimination of the level L we obtain 
1 U ^ In 1) 1u 
——— In S + constant - constant 
In n Ir. n 
the ovlory of the top(official »)&ano£cr is a fancti n of oise >f 
company 
that is the rsmtxx relation empirically bservo by Leberta. 
It mi I t be hoped that Robert" relati n also holds more 
enerolly for all organisations Ire Los itala, city a minis rati ns 
etc. alth ugh the measure of sise becomes again more r belomatic 
(a-.-'loyaent? which would however not fit automatic d cor -ora ions). 
Simon new passes to another empirical observation, a e by Davis, 
The froquo.-oy distributi n or density of executive’s sal ...ieo 
at General oiors in 193^ > ! as a 1 arete distribution: 
C* <=» n IT C’ sal ry , IT number of executives receiving 6’ 
The number of mangers 1 level L’ from the top is 
II ( L’ ) . n L ’’ 1 
Simon new w ites from assumption P. 
/ . 1-L’ 
C’(L’) = I£ b 
but his II must be logically equal to the topsal ry C, although he 
doon not say so. 
The equation obtained by el :i.minuting L* i therefore 
In b 
In n 
In C’ 
In H + In C
	        

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.